aos
Publiée par EDP Santé
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 253, Mars 2011
Page(s) 55 - 61
Section Chirurgie orale et implantologie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2011106
Publié en ligne 22 mars 2011
  1. Bedrossian E, Rangert B, Stumpel L, Indresano T. Immediate function with the zygomatic implant: a graftless solution for the patient with mild to advanced atrophy of the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(6):270-4. [PubMed]
  2. Berglundh T, Abrahamson I, Albouy JP, Lindhe J. Bone healing at implants with fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 2007;18(2):147-52. [CrossRef]
  3. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennenberg A, Holmén A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(5):659-66. [PubMed]
  4. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles Sean S, Stach RM. Five-Year Survival Distributions of Short-Length (10 mm or less) Machined-Surfaces and Osseotite® Implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res April 2004;6(1):16-23. [CrossRef]
  5. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4.641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connexion of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1991;6(2):142-6. [PubMed]
  6. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62(1):2-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Malo P, de Araùjo Nobre M, Rangert B. Shorts implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res March 2007;9(1):15-21. [CrossRef]
  8. Misch CE. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dent Today 2005;24(8):64-6,68. [PubMed]
  9. Murray A. Short dental implants as a treatment option: results from an observational study in a single private practice. JOMI sept-oct 2006; 21(5):769-76.
  10. Nédélec O. Est-il raisonnable de caractériser un implant uniquement par sa longueur ? Alpha Oméga News oct. 2008.
  11. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implant Res 2005;16(4):486-94. [CrossRef]
  12. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant lenght and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(4):254-62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Renouard F, Nisand D. Shorts implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1: S104-10.
  14. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. First Consensus Conference, Feb 2006, Pfäffikon, Switzerland. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:35-51.
  15. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D. Short (8 mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3-to 14-year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19(6):586-92. [PubMed]
  16. Schulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2007, 98:1-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tawil G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(6):894-901. [PubMed]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.