aos
Publiée par EDP Santé
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 253, Mars 2011
Page(s) 55 - 61
Section Chirurgie orale et implantologie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2011106
Publié en ligne 22 mars 2011
  1. Bedrossian E, Rangert B, Stumpel L, Indresano T. Immediate function with the zygomatic implant: a graftless solution for the patient with mild to advanced atrophy of the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(6):270-4. [PubMed]
  2. Berglundh T, Abrahamson I, Albouy JP, Lindhe J. Bone healing at implants with fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 2007;18(2):147-52. [CrossRef]
  3. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennenberg A, Holmén A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(5):659-66. [PubMed]
  4. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles Sean S, Stach RM. Five-Year Survival Distributions of Short-Length (10 mm or less) Machined-Surfaces and Osseotite® Implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res April 2004;6(1):16-23. [CrossRef]
  5. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4.641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connexion of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1991;6(2):142-6. [PubMed]
  6. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62(1):2-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Malo P, de Araùjo Nobre M, Rangert B. Shorts implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res March 2007;9(1):15-21. [CrossRef]
  8. Misch CE. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dent Today 2005;24(8):64-6,68. [PubMed]
  9. Murray A. Short dental implants as a treatment option: results from an observational study in a single private practice. JOMI sept-oct 2006; 21(5):769-76.
  10. Nédélec O. Est-il raisonnable de caractériser un implant uniquement par sa longueur ? Alpha Oméga News oct. 2008.
  11. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implant Res 2005;16(4):486-94. [CrossRef]
  12. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant lenght and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(4):254-62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Renouard F, Nisand D. Shorts implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1: S104-10.
  14. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. First Consensus Conference, Feb 2006, Pfäffikon, Switzerland. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:35-51.
  15. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D. Short (8 mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3-to 14-year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19(6):586-92. [PubMed]
  16. Schulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2007, 98:1-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tawil G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(6):894-901. [PubMed]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.