aos
Publiée par EDP Santé
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 254, Juin 2011
Page(s) 113 - 120
Section Odontologie conservatrice
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2011203
Publié en ligne 8 juin 2011
  1. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heyman HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34:97-105. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Blunck U, Knitter K, Jahn K. Six month clinical evaluation of XP BOND in non carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:265-8. [PubMed]
  4. Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, Iwaku M. Non-pressure adhesion of a new restorative system. J Dent Res 1979;59:1364-70.
  5. Degrange M, Roulet JF. Minimally invasive dentistry with bonding. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1997.
  6. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:846-53.
  7. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2step and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:47-56. [PubMed]
  8. De Munck J, Van Meerbeeck B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strength of one-and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:414-20. [PubMed]
  9. Cardoso PEC, Sadek FT. Microtensile bond strength on dentin using new adhesive systems with self-etching primers. Braz J Oral Sc 2003;2:156-9.
  10. Degrange M. Les adhésifs qui requièrent un mordançage préalable sont-ils obsolètes? Inf Dent 2007;4:1-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Braem M. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:(1) 690-702.
  12. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:593-9. [PubMed]
  13. Schwartz RS, Haveman CW, Conn LJ, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Clinical evaluation of a one bottle adhesive. J Dent Res 1998;77:297 (Abstr. 1534).
  14. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. The effect of enamel bevel on the microleakage of cervical resin composites. Dent Mater 2002 (p. 252 [Abstr. 117]).
  15. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34(2):97-105. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. American Dental Association-Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance Program Guidelines-Restorative Materials; March 1996. (available at: http://www.ada.org/prof/ resources/positions/standards/ guide_restormaterials.pdf).
  17. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of an all in one bonding system to non carious cervical lesion-a results at one year. Austr Dent J 2003;48(3):180-2. [CrossRef]
  18. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landyut K,Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:7-10. [PubMed]
  19. Santiago SL, Franco EB, Mendonsa JS, Lauris JRP, Navarro MF. One-year clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in non carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11(3):175-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. J Dent 2000;16:285-91.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.