Parresia logo
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 255, Septembre 2011
Page(s) 207 - 220
Section Odontologie conservatrice
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2011304
Publié en ligne 19 septembre 2011
  1. Fung L, Smales R, Ngo H, Mount G. Diagnostic comparison of three groups of examiners using visual and laser fluorescence methods to detect occlusal caries in vitro. Aust Dent J 2004;49(2):67-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hennequin M, Lasfargues JJ. La démarche diagnostique en cariologie. Réal Clin 1999;10(4):515-39. [Google Scholar]
  3. Staudt CB, Lussi A, Jacquet J, Kiliaridis S. White spot lesions around brackets: in vitro detection by laser fluorescence. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:237-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tagtekin DA et al. Caries detection with DIAGNOdent and ultrasound. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106(5):729-35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BamzahimM, Shi XQ, Angmar-Mansson B. Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic caries monitor: in vitro comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:360-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Valera FB, Pessan JP, Valera RC, Mondelli J, Percinoto C. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions. Am J Dent 2008;21:25-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Qvist V, Schou S. Detection, diagnosing, monitoring and logical treatment of occlusal caries in relation to lesion activity and severity: an in vivo examination with histological validation. Caries Res 1998;32:247-54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sridhar N, Tandon S, Rao N. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20(3):326-31 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. BamzahimM, Shi XQ, Angmar-Mansson B. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62:61-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Côrtes DF, Ekstrand KR, Elias-Botena AR, Ellwood RP. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth. Caries Res 2000;34:443-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Francescut P, Lussi A. Impact of DIAGNOdent values of formalin and chloramine storage solutions. Caries Res Abstracts 2000;34:325. [Google Scholar]
  12. Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dental J 2001;190(8):440-3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Angnes G, Angnes V, Grande RHM, Battistella M, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent teeth: an in vitro study. Braz Oral Res 2005;19(4):243-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Baseren NM, Gokalp S. Validity of laser fluorescence system (DIAGNOdent) for detection of occlusal caries in third molars : an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1190-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lussi A, Hellwig E. Performance of new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. J Dent 2006; 34: 467-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shi XQ, Welander U, Angmar-Manson B. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2000;34:151-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B, Nyvad B. Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces. Caries Res 1998;32:204-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lussi A. Intérêt et principe d’utilisation du DIAGNOdent en cariologie. Réal Clin 2004;15(3):227-34. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shi XQ, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Mansson B. Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth-surfaces caries: an in vitro study. Act Odontol Scand 2001;59:74-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mendes FM, Hissadomi M, Imparato JCP. Effects of drying time and the presence of plaque on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence in occlusal caries of primary teeth. Caries Res 2004;38:104-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lussi A, Hibst R, Paulus R. DIAGNOdent: an optical method for caries detection. J Dent Res 2004; Spec Iss. C: C80-C83. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bader JD, Shugars DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1413-26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lussi A, Reich E. The influence of toothpastes and prophylaxis pastes on fluorescence measurements for caries detection in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:141-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Astvaldsdóttir A, Holbrook WP, Tranaeus S. Consistency of DIAGNOdent instruments for clinical assessment of fissure caries. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62(4):193-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Anttonen V, Seppä L, Hausen H. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusa caries in children. Caries Res 2003;37:17-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]