Parresia logo
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 258, Juin 2012
Page(s) 115 - 126
Section Imagerie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2012204
Publié en ligne 29 juin 2012
  1. Bellaiche N. Scanner et tomographie à faisceau conique. Quelle méthode d’imagerie choisir en odontostomatologie ? Le Fil Dentaire 2007;27:16-28. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjerklin K, Ericson S. How a computerized tomography examination changed the treatment plans of 80 children with retained and ectopically positioned maxillary canines. Angle Orthod 2006;76(1):43-51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernardes RA, Gomes de Moraes IG, Húngaro Duarte MA, Azevedo BC, de Azevedo JR, Bramante C. Use of cone-beam volumetric tomography in the diagnosis of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108(2):270-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavézian R. Imagerie dentomaxillaire: passé, présent, limites et perspectives. Les Journées Dentaires Internationales du Québec, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dental J 2009;207(1):23-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. EADMFR (European Academy Dentomaxillofacial Radiology). Basic principles for use of dental Cone Beam CT. Consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. January, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Éthier J, Forest D. Les applications de la tomographie volumique à faisceau conique (TVFC) en médecine dentaire. Journal de l’Ordre des Dentistes du Québec 2009;46(3):7-24. [Google Scholar]
  9. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. The basics of maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography. In: Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Haskell BS. Guest eds. Cone Beam Computer Tomography. Seminars in Orthodontics, ed. Sadowsky PL. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., The Netherlands 2009;15(1):2-13 [Google Scholar]
  10. Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, Huang JC. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137(5):590-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HAS. Tomographie volumique a faisceau conique de la face (cone beam computerized tomography). Rapport d’évaluation technologique. Saint-Denis, Décembre 2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. HAS. Tomographie volumique à faisceau conique de la face (cone beam). Note de cadrage. Saint-Denis, Juin 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lemkamp M, Filippi A, Berndt D, Lambrecht JT. Possibilités de diagnostic par tomographie volumique numérisée. Rev Mens Suisse Odontostomatol 2006;116(6):651-3. [Google Scholar]
  14. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E,Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009;71(3):461-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35(4):219-26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Orpe EC. Some current legal issues that may affect oral and maxillofacial radiology. Part 2: digital monitors and cone-beam computed tomography. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73(6):507-11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Orpe EC. Computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Part 2: Cone-beam computed tomography. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;18:85-92. [Google Scholar]
  18. Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Scheer M, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(5):633-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ogawa N, Miyazaki Y, Kubota M, Huang JC, Miller AJ, Maki K. Application of cone beam CT 3D images to cephalometric analysis. Orthodontic waves 2010;69(4):138-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Quereshy FA, Savell TA, Palomo JM. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66(4):791-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rouas P, Bandon D, Nancy J, Delbos Y, Hauret L. La tomographie volumétrique numérisée par le système NewTom: intérêt de ce nouvel examen d’imagerie médicale chez l’enfant. Arch Pédiatr 2006;13:1169-77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(2):276-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56(3):413-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89(5):630-7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. White SC, Pae EK. Patient image selection criteria for Cone Beam Computed Tomography imaging. Semin Orthod 2009;15:19-28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]