aos
Publiée par EDP Santé
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 258, Juin 2012
Page(s) 151 - 160
Section Endodontie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2012207
Publié en ligne 29 juin 2012
  1. Anderson ME, Price JW, Parashos P. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2007;33(10):1212-6. [CrossRef]
  2. Arbab-Chirani R, Chevalier V, Arbab-Chirani S, Calloch S. Instrumentation canalaire de préparation. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris), Médecine buccale 2010;28-725-A-10.
  3. Bahia MG, Buono VT. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100(2):249-55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Beer R, Baumann MA, Kielbassa AM. Atlas de poche d’endodontie. Paris: Flammarion, Médecine-Sciences, 2006.
  5. Bertrand MF. Anatomie canalaire et radiculaire. Cours Diplôme Inter Universitaire d’Endodontie, 2005.
  6. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: Protaper versus Profile. J Endod 2003;29(1):15-19. [CrossRef]
  7. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30(4):228-30. [CrossRef]
  8. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, Micallef JP. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29(9):567-75. [CrossRef]
  9. Claisse A, Haikel Y. Les dossiers de l’ADF. Les systèmes Nickel-Titane en rotation continue. Paris: ADF éditions, 2003.
  10. Chaves Craveiro de Melo M, Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia M, Lopes Buono VT. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2002;28(11):765-9. [CrossRef]
  11. Darabara M, Bourithis L, Zinelis S, Papadimitriou GD. Susceptibility to localized corrosion of stainless steel and NiTi endodontic instruments in irrigating solutions. Int Endod J 2004;37(10):705-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Daugherty DW, Gound TG, Comer TL. Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endod 2001;27(2):93-5. [CrossRef]
  13. Dietz DB, Di Fiore PM,Bahcall JK, Lautenschlager EP. Effect of rational speed on the breakage of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2000;26(2):68-71. [CrossRef]
  14. Di Fiore PM. A dozen ways to prevent nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(2):196-201. [PubMed]
  15. Fife D, Gambarini G, Britto LrL. Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments after clinical use. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97(2):251-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gagnot G. Les ultrasons en odontologie. Rueil-Malmaison: CdP, Coll. Memento, 2008.
  17. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use with lowand high-torque endodontic motors. J Endod 2001;27(12):772-4. [CrossRef]
  18. Gencoglu N, Helvacioglu D. Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instrument from root canal systems. Eur J Dent 2009;3(2):90-95. [PubMed]
  19. Oiknine M, Benizri J. Origine des fractures et de l’usure des limes NiTi en endodontie. Rev Odonto Stomatol 2007;36(2):109-22.
  20. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2004;30(10):722-5. [CrossRef]
  21. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2003;36(2):93-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;23(2):77-85. [CrossRef]
  23. Sattapan B, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod 2000;26(3):156-60. [CrossRef]
  24. Schrader C, Peters OA. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod 2005;31(2):120-3. [CrossRef]
  25. Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98(5):605-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests. J Endod 2002;28(6):448-51. [CrossRef]
  27. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31(3):183-6. [CrossRef]
  28. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P. Failure of ProFile instruments used with high and low torque motors. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):471-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yared GM, Kulkarini GK, Ghossayn F. An in vitro study of the torsionnal properties of new and used K3 instruments. Int Endod J 2003;36(11):764-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zelada G, Varela P, Martin B, Bahillo JG, Magán F, Ahn S. The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root canals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2002;28(7):540-2. [CrossRef]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.