Parresia logo
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 258, Juin 2012
Page(s) 151 - 160
Section Endodontie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2012207
Publié en ligne 29 juin 2012
  1. Anderson ME, Price JW, Parashos P. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2007;33(10):1212-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arbab-Chirani R, Chevalier V, Arbab-Chirani S, Calloch S. Instrumentation canalaire de préparation. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris), Médecine buccale 2010;28-725-A-10. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahia MG, Buono VT. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100(2):249-55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beer R, Baumann MA, Kielbassa AM. Atlas de poche d’endodontie. Paris: Flammarion, Médecine-Sciences, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertrand MF. Anatomie canalaire et radiculaire. Cours Diplôme Inter Universitaire d’Endodontie, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  6. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I, Ibba A. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: Protaper versus Profile. J Endod 2003;29(1):15-19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30(4):228-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, Micallef JP. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29(9):567-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Claisse A, Haikel Y. Les dossiers de l’ADF. Les systèmes Nickel-Titane en rotation continue. Paris: ADF éditions, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  10. Chaves Craveiro de Melo M, Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia M, Lopes Buono VT. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2002;28(11):765-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Darabara M, Bourithis L, Zinelis S, Papadimitriou GD. Susceptibility to localized corrosion of stainless steel and NiTi endodontic instruments in irrigating solutions. Int Endod J 2004;37(10):705-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Daugherty DW, Gound TG, Comer TL. Comparison of fracture rate, deformation rate, and efficiency between rotary endodontic instruments driven at 150 rpm and 350 rpm. J Endod 2001;27(2):93-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dietz DB, Di Fiore PM,Bahcall JK, Lautenschlager EP. Effect of rational speed on the breakage of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2000;26(2):68-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Di Fiore PM. A dozen ways to prevent nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(2):196-201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fife D, Gambarini G, Britto LrL. Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments after clinical use. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97(2):251-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gagnot G. Les ultrasons en odontologie. Rueil-Malmaison: CdP, Coll. Memento, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use with lowand high-torque endodontic motors. J Endod 2001;27(12):772-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gencoglu N, Helvacioglu D. Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instrument from root canal systems. Eur J Dent 2009;3(2):90-95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Oiknine M, Benizri J. Origine des fractures et de l’usure des limes NiTi en endodontie. Rev Odonto Stomatol 2007;36(2):109-22. [Google Scholar]
  20. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2004;30(10):722-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2003;36(2):93-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;23(2):77-85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sattapan B, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod 2000;26(3):156-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schrader C, Peters OA. Analysis of torque and force with differently tapered rotary endodontic instruments in vitro. J Endod 2005;31(2):120-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98(5):605-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel-titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests. J Endod 2002;28(6):448-51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31(3):183-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P. Failure of ProFile instruments used with high and low torque motors. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):471-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yared GM, Kulkarini GK, Ghossayn F. An in vitro study of the torsionnal properties of new and used K3 instruments. Int Endod J 2003;36(11):764-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zelada G, Varela P, Martin B, Bahillo JG, Magán F, Ahn S. The effect of rotational speed and the curvature of root canals on the breakage of rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2002;28(7):540-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.