Publiée par EDP Santé
Open Access
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 259, Septembre 2012
Numéro spécial faculté d’odontologie de Montpellier
Page(s) 219 - 230
Publié en ligne 10 septembre 2012
  1. Conseil des Communautés Européennes. Directive 93/42/CEE du conseil du 14 juin 1993 relative aux dispositifs médicaux. Journal Officiel des Communautés Européennes L 169 du 12.7.1993.
  2. Leprince J, Devaux J, Mullier T, Vreven J, Leloup G. Pulpal-temperature rise and polymerization efficiency of LED curing lights. Oper Dent 2010;35(2):220-30. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Atai M, Motevasselian F. Temperature rise and degree of photopolymerization conversion of nanocomposites and conventional dental composites. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13(3):309-16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Guiraldo RD, Consani S, Lympius T, Schneider LF, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Influence of the light curing unit and thickness of residual dentin on generation of heat during composite photoactivation. J Oral Sci 2008;50(2):137-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Watts DC, Cash AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials : methods development. Dent Mater 1991;7(4):281-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Watts DC, Marouf AS. Optimal specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strain measurements on light-cured biomaterials. Dent Mater 2000;16(6):447-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tran CC, Angeletakis C, Shellard E. Dependence of bonded-disk shrinkage measurements on sample dimensions. IADR/AADR/CADR 80th General Session, San Diego, 2002.
  8. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Polymerization contraction of resin composite vs. energy and power density of light-cure. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113(5):417-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ilie N, Hickel R. Can CQ be completely replaced by alternative initiators in dental adhesives?. Dent Mater J 2008;27(2):221-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Schneider LF, Pfeifer CS, Consani S, Prahl SA, Ferracane JL. Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2008;24(9):1169-77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Miletic VJ, Santini A. Remaining unreacted methacrylate groups in resin-based composite with respect to sample preparation and storing conditions using micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87(2):468-74. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kneževiæ A, Ristiæ A, Tarle Z, Pichler G, Musiæ S. Degree of conversion and temperature increase during composite polymerisation with LED units of different intensity. Acta Stomatol Croat 2008;42(1):19-29.
  13. Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive : an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(2):200-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(Suppl 4) :32-47. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Oliva X, Oliva J, Oliva JD. Full-mouth oral rehabilitation in a titanium allergy patient using zirconium oxide dental implants and zirconium oxide restorations. A case report from an ongoing clinical study. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010;5(2):190-203. [PubMed]
  16. Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants : a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21(1):27-36. [PubMed]
  17. Khaldi L, Taleb-Bendiab C, Victoria-Herrera J, Torres JH, Cuisinier F. Ostéointégration des implants ZIR.ROC vissésRen zircone : analyse histologique chez le chien. Stratégie Prothétique 2009;9(5):377-9.
  18. JORF. Rapport au Président de la République relatif à l’ordonnance n2˚010-250 du 11 mars 2010 relative aux dispositifs médicaux. Journal Officiel n0˚060 du 12 mars 2010.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.